🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I think there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.