🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."