🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their wards.