🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a bill raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended parents to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the family of a teenager who died after encountering harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the local level amid national gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to follow Australia's lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, other nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this international conversation continues, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that states around the world are less and less willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.